RCMP Use of Clearview AI Facial Recognition Without Privacy Assessment
The RCMP used a facial recognition tool built on billions of scraped photos without any privacy assessment.
The RCMP used Clearview AI's facial recognition technology beginning in approximately October 2019 (Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, 2021). Clearview AI's system works by scraping billions of images from the open internet — including social media platforms — without consent, then building a searchable biometric database that allows law enforcement to upload a photo and find matches (New York Times, 2020; Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, 2021).
The OPC's investigation found that the RCMP used Clearview AI without conducting a Privacy Impact Assessment, without establishing that it had legal authority to collect personal information through the tool, and without adequate internal governance over the technology's adoption (Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, 2021). Individual RCMP members began using the tool after Clearview AI provided trial access. The RCMP did not conduct a formal assessment of the tool's privacy implications before operational use (Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, 2021).
The OPC's joint investigation into Clearview AI (with provincial counterparts in Quebec, Alberta, and British Columbia) found that Clearview AI's scraping of images constituted collection of biometric information without meaningful consent, violating PIPEDA (Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, 2021). The investigation into the RCMP specifically found that the RCMP's use of Clearview AI contravened the Privacy Act, as the force collected personal information through a third party that had itself collected it unlawfully (Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, 2021).
Clearview AI voluntarily ceased offering its services in Canada on July 3, 2020, during the ongoing investigation. Following the investigation, the RCMP agreed to implement the OPC's recommendations, including implementing a governance framework for new technology adoption — though the RCMP disagreed with the OPC's finding that it had contravened the Privacy Act, arguing the law does not expressly impose a duty to confirm the legal basis for third-party collection (Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, 2021).
Materialized From
Harms
Billions of images scraped from social media and the open web without consent to build a biometric database, and RCMP collected personal information through a third party that had itself collected it unlawfully, contravening the Privacy Act.
Federal law enforcement adopted a mass biometric surveillance tool without conducting a privacy impact assessment, establishing legal authority, or implementing governance controls over its use.
Evidence
3 reports
- Joint investigation of Clearview AI, Inc. Primary source
OPC joint investigation found Clearview AI scraped billions of images without consent to build biometric database; RCMP used the technology without privacy impact assessment; Clearview AI violated PIPEDA
-
Investigative reporting revealed Clearview AI's technology and the scope of its facial recognition database scraped from the open internet
-
OPC Special Report to Parliament documenting RCMP's use of Clearview AI without privacy impact assessment; RCMP began using technology approximately October 2019
Record details
Responses & Outcomes
Unilaterally ceased offering services in Canada
Published joint investigation finding that Clearview AI's scraping of images violated PIPEDA by collecting biometric information without meaningful consent
Published Special Report to Parliament on the RCMP's use of Clearview AI, finding the RCMP contravened the Privacy Act
Agreed to implement OPC recommendations including a governance framework for new technology adoption, while disagreeing with the finding of Privacy Act contravention
Policy Recommendationsassessed
The RCMP should dedicate resources and put in place processes to ensure that privacy impact assessments are carried out before personal information is collected through new technologies
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (Jun 10, 2021)Parliament should amend the Privacy Act to clarify that the RCMP has an obligation to ensure that third-party agents from which it collects personal information have acted lawfully
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (Jun 10, 2021)The RCMP should institute systems to track novel collections of personal information, establish compliance checkpoints, clarify authorization policies, and monitor for unauthorized collection activities
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (Jun 10, 2021)Editorial Assessment assessed
Federal law enforcement adopted a mass surveillance facial recognition tool without conducting a privacy impact assessment, public disclosure, or establishing legal authority for biometric surveillance (Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, 2021; Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, 2021).
Entities Involved
AI Systems Involved
Used by RCMP officers to upload photos and identify persons of interest by matching against a database of billions of scraped images
Related Records
- Cadillac Fairview Collected Five Million Shopper Images Using Undisclosed Facial Recognition in Canadian Mallsrelated
- Canadian Tire Deployed Facial Recognition to Identify Shoppers in British Columbia Storesrelated
- Edmonton Police First to Deploy Facial Recognition Body Cameras; Privacy Commissioner Says Approval Not Obtainedrelated
- Three Ontario Regional Police Services Built a Shared Facial Recognition Database of 1.6 Million Imagesrelated
- Montreal Police Acquired AI Video Surveillance Platform with Undisclosed Biometric Capabilitiesrelated
Taxonomyassessed
AIID: Incident #267
Changelog
| Version | Date | Change |
|---|---|---|
| v1 | Mar 7, 2026 | Initial publication |
| v2 | Mar 11, 2026 | Neutrality and factuality review: changed 'unilaterally' to 'voluntarily' per OPC language; aligned FR narrative ending with EN (added RCMP disagreement with OPC finding, removed inaccurate claim that RCMP voluntarily ceased use pending legal authority); tightened policy recommendations to match actual OPC report language (removed fabricated 'independent oversight' recommendation not found in cited source, narrowed remaining three to reflect OPC's RCMP-specific recommendations rather than broad policy prescriptions). |