Utilisation de Clearview AI par la GRC sans évaluation de la vie privée
La GRC a utilisé un outil de reconnaissance faciale construit à partir de milliards de photos récoltées sans aucune évaluation de la vie privée.
The RCMP used Clearview AI's facial recognition technology beginning in approximately October 2019 (Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, 2021). Clearview AI's system works by scraping billions of images from the open internet — including social media platforms — without consent, then building a searchable biometric database that allows law enforcement to upload a photo and find matches (New York Times, 2020; Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, 2021).
The OPC's investigation found that the RCMP used Clearview AI without conducting a Privacy Impact Assessment, without establishing that it had legal authority to collect personal information through the tool, and without adequate internal governance over the technology's adoption (Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, 2021). Individual RCMP members began using the tool after Clearview AI provided trial access. The RCMP did not conduct a formal assessment of the tool's privacy implications before operational use (Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, 2021).
The OPC's joint investigation into Clearview AI (with provincial counterparts in Quebec, Alberta, and British Columbia) found that Clearview AI's scraping of images constituted collection of biometric information without meaningful consent, violating PIPEDA (Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, 2021). The investigation into the RCMP specifically found that the RCMP's use of Clearview AI contravened the Privacy Act, as the force collected personal information through a third party that had itself collected it unlawfully (Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, 2021).
Clearview AI voluntarily ceased offering its services in Canada on July 3, 2020, during the ongoing investigation. Following the investigation, the RCMP agreed to implement the OPC's recommendations, including implementing a governance framework for new technology adoption — though the RCMP disagreed with the OPC's finding that it had contravened the Privacy Act, arguing the law does not expressly impose a duty to confirm the legal basis for third-party collection (Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, 2021).
Matérialisé à partir de
Préjudices
Des milliards d'images ont été collectées sur les médias sociaux et le Web ouvert sans consentement pour constituer une base de données biométrique, et la GRC a collecté des renseignements personnels par l'entremise d'un tiers qui les avait lui-même collectés de manière illégale, contrevenant ainsi à la Loi sur la protection des renseignements personnels.
Les forces de l'ordre fédérales ont adopté un outil de surveillance biométrique de masse sans effectuer d'évaluation des facteurs relatifs à la vie privée, sans établir l'autorité légale nécessaire ni mettre en place de contrôles de gouvernance encadrant son utilisation.
Preuves
3 rapports
- Joint investigation of Clearview AI, Inc. Source principale
OPC joint investigation found Clearview AI scraped billions of images without consent to build biometric database; RCMP used the technology without privacy impact assessment; Clearview AI violated PIPEDA
-
Investigative reporting revealed Clearview AI's technology and the scope of its facial recognition database scraped from the open internet
-
OPC Special Report to Parliament documenting RCMP's use of Clearview AI without privacy impact assessment; RCMP began using technology approximately October 2019
Détails de la fiche
Réponses et résultats
Unilaterally ceased offering services in Canada
Published joint investigation finding that Clearview AI's scraping of images violated PIPEDA by collecting biometric information without meaningful consent
Published Special Report to Parliament on the RCMP's use of Clearview AI, finding the RCMP contravened the Privacy Act
Agreed to implement OPC recommendations including a governance framework for new technology adoption, while disagreeing with the finding of Privacy Act contravention
Recommandations de politiqueévalué
La GRC devrait consacrer les ressources nécessaires et mettre en place des processus pour s'assurer que des évaluations des facteurs relatifs à la vie privée sont effectuées avant que des renseignements personnels ne soient collectés au moyen de nouvelles technologies
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (10 juin 2021)Le Parlement devrait modifier la Loi sur la protection des renseignements personnels afin de préciser que la GRC a l'obligation de s'assurer que les tiers auprès desquels elle collecte des renseignements personnels ont agi de manière licite
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (10 juin 2021)La GRC devrait mettre en place des systèmes pour suivre les nouvelles collectes de renseignements personnels, établir des points de contrôle de conformité, clarifier les politiques d'autorisation et surveiller les activités de collecte non autorisées
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (10 juin 2021)Évaluation éditoriale évalué
Les forces de l'ordre fédérales ont adopté un outil de surveillance par reconnaissance faciale de masse sans effectuer d'évaluation des facteurs relatifs à la vie privée (Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, 2021), sans divulgation publique ni établissement d'une autorité légale pour la surveillance biométrique.
Entités impliquées
Systèmes d'IA impliqués
Used by RCMP officers to upload photos and identify persons of interest by matching against a database of billions of scraped images
Fiches connexes
- Cadillac Fairview Collected Five Million Shopper Images Using Undisclosed Facial Recognition in Canadian Mallsrelated
- Canadian Tire Deployed Facial Recognition to Identify Shoppers in British Columbia Storesrelated
- Edmonton Police First to Deploy Facial Recognition Body Cameras; Privacy Commissioner Says Approval Not Obtainedrelated
- Three Ontario Regional Police Services Built a Shared Facial Recognition Database of 1.6 Million Imagesrelated
- Montreal Police Acquired AI Video Surveillance Platform with Undisclosed Biometric Capabilitiesrelated
Taxonomieévalué
AIID : Incident #267
Historique des modifications
| Version | Date | Modification |
|---|---|---|
| v1 | 7 mars 2026 | Initial publication |
| v2 | 11 mars 2026 | Neutrality and factuality review: changed 'unilaterally' to 'voluntarily' per OPC language; aligned FR narrative ending with EN (added RCMP disagreement with OPC finding, removed inaccurate claim that RCMP voluntarily ceased use pending legal authority); tightened policy recommendations to match actual OPC report language (removed fabricated 'independent oversight' recommendation not found in cited source, narrowed remaining three to reflect OPC's RCMP-specific recommendations rather than broad policy prescriptions). |