Phase pilote : CAIM est en construction. Les fiches sont provisoires, basées sur des sources publiques, et n’ont pas encore été révisées par des pairs. Commentaires bienvenus.
Confirmé Important

Des bornes de centres commerciaux ont secrètement capturé les visages de cinq millions de clients dans cinq provinces avant l'intervention des régulateurs.

Survenu: 1 juillet 2018 (approximate) au 29 octobre 2020 Signalé: 29 octobre 2020

Cadillac Fairview, one of North America's largest owners, operators, and developers of commercial properties, embedded small cameras inside digital directory kiosks at 12 shopping malls across five provinces — Ontario, Quebec, Alberta, British Columbia, and Manitoba (OPC, 2020; CBC News, 2020). These included high-traffic properties such as Toronto's Eaton Centre and CF Carrefour Laval in Laval, Quebec. The cameras captured images of shoppers without their knowledge or consent — over five million numerical facial representations were generated — and facial recognition software analyzed the images to estimate each person's age and gender (OPC, 2020; CBC News, 2020).

A joint investigation by the federal Privacy Commissioner, Alberta's Information and Privacy Commissioner, and British Columbia's Information and Privacy Commissioner — with Quebec's Commission d'accès à l'information collaborating separately — found that Cadillac Fairview violated the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) (OPC, 2020). The investigation revealed that the third-party technology provider Mappedin had retained approximately five million numerical facial representations on a decommissioned server (OPC, 2020). The commissioners found the company had failed to obtain meaningful consent for the collection of sensitive biometric information and had not been transparent about the facial recognition capabilities embedded in the kiosks (OPC, 2020).

The investigation concluded that shoppers had no reasonable expectation that visiting a mall would result in the capture and analysis of their biometric data (OPC, 2020). While mall entrances displayed generic security camera decals stating premises were video-recorded for safety purposes, no signage disclosed the facial recognition or biometric analysis capabilities of the kiosk cameras (OPC, 2020). The commissioners recommended that Cadillac Fairview delete the collected data and obtain express consent before any future use of such technology (OPC, 2020). Cadillac Fairview subsequently confirmed it had deleted the data and removed the cameras, though the commissioners noted that CF refused to commit to obtaining express opt-in consent before any future use of similar technology (OPC, 2020).

Matérialisé à partir de

Préjudices

Plus de cinq millions de représentations faciales numériques ont été captées de clients dans 12 centres commerciaux canadiens à leur insu et sans leur consentement, et un fournisseur de technologie tiers a conservé ces données biométriques sur un serveur mis hors service.

Vie privée et donnéesSurveillance disproportionnéeImportantPopulation

Des caméras de reconnaissance faciale non divulguées ont été intégrées dans des bornes-annuaires numériques pour analyser l'âge et le sexe des clients sans aucune signalisation ni divulgation, collectant des données auprès de visiteurs dans cinq provinces.

Vie privée et donnéesSurveillance disproportionnéeImportantPopulation

Preuves

2 rapports

  1. Officiel — Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (29 oct. 2020)

    OPC joint investigation found Cadillac Fairview collected approximately 5 million facial images from shoppers at 12 malls across 5 provinces without knowledge or consent; facial recognition embedded in digital directory kiosks

  2. Média — CBC News (29 oct. 2020)

    Media reporting on the OPC investigation findings; Cadillac Fairview collected 5 million shopper images using undisclosed facial recognition

Détails de la fiche

Réponses et résultats

Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du CanadainvestigationActif

Published joint investigation finding that Cadillac Fairview violated PIPEDA by collecting biometric information without meaningful consent, and recommended deletion of data and express consent for any future use

Cadillac Fairviewinstitutional actionActif

Confirmed deletion of collected biometric data and removal of facial recognition cameras from mall kiosks

Recommandations de politiqueévalué

Obtain express consent before collecting biometric information through facial recognition technology in retail environments

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (28 oct. 2020)

Ensure transparency about the use of facial recognition and biometric analysis through clear disclosure to affected individuals

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (28 oct. 2020)

Delete biometric data collected without meaningful consent and implement governance controls before any future biometric collection

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (28 oct. 2020)

Évaluation éditoriale évalué

Plus de cinq millions de représentations faciales ont été captées et analysées sans la connaissance ni le consentement de clients dans 12 centres commerciaux répartis dans cinq provinces (Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, 2020; CBC News, 2020) — l'une des plus grandes opérations de collecte de données biométriques non divulguées documentées au Canada.

Entités impliquées

Systèmes d'IA impliqués

Quividi AVA Audience Measurement

Facial detection technology embedded in digital directory kiosks to estimate shoppers' age and gender for advertising analytics

Fiches connexes

Taxonomieévalué

Domaine
Commerce
Type de préjudice
Vie privée et donnéesSurveillance disproportionnée
Voie de contribution de l'IA
Contexte de déploiementSupervision absente
Phase du cycle de vie
DéploiementSurveillance

AIID : Incident #358

Historique des modifications

Historique des modifications
VersionDateModification
v18 mars 2026Initial publication
v211 mars 2026Corrected scope to 'North America' per OPC report; named Mappedin as third-party provider; clarified that generic security signage existed but did not disclose facial recognition; added CF's refusal to commit to future consent; fixed recommendation source dates

Version 2