Déploiement de l'IA dans les établissements d'enseignement canadiens avec des préjudices documentés aux étudiants

AI systems are deployed in Canadian educational institutions for student monitoring, risk prediction, plagiarism detection, and assessment. Multiple provincial privacy investigations have issued findings concerning AI systems affecting students.

The Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario investigated McMaster University's use of Respondus Monitor, an AI-powered exam proctoring tool (PI21-00001, February 2024). The IPC found that notice to students about data collection purposes did not meet FIPPA requirements and that contractual safeguards were insufficient. Respondus used students' audio and video recordings — including through third-party researchers — to train its AI system without student consent. The IPC issued findings and recommendations.

Quebec's Commission d'accès à l'information investigated a school board (Centre de services scolaire du Val-des-Cerfs) that used an algorithmic tool to predict grade-six students' dropout risk. The Commission found that the tool produced new personal information — predictive dropout indicators — constituting a collection of personal information under Quebec's public sector privacy law. The school board had not informed parents about the use of their children's data for predictive scoring.

The University of British Columbia's Vancouver and Okanagan Senates passed motions in March 2021 restricting automated remote invigilation tools using algorithmic analysis. Independent research by Lucy Satheesan (reported by VICE Motherboard, April 2021) found that Proctorio's facial detection algorithm had a 57% non-recognition rate for Black faces. The UBC Teaching and Learning Committee cited racial discrimination concerns. Six faculties discontinued Proctorio.

Research published by Stanford University found that AI text detection tools misclassified 61.22% of TOEFL essays written by non-native English speakers as AI-generated. Multiple Canadian universities have adopted and subsequently reconsidered AI detection policies.

In August 2025, a Newfoundland and Labrador provincial education report was found to contain 15 or more citations to sources that do not exist, consistent with AI-generated text. The report's co-chairs — Memorial University professors — stated publicly that the fabricated citations were introduced by the provincial government after they submitted their draft, not by the original authors. The report was withdrawn for revisions.

Education is provincial jurisdiction in Canada. No pan-Canadian governance framework addresses AI use in educational institutions. The Council of Ministers of Education discussed AI's implications at its 112th meeting in June 2024; no coordinated policy has resulted. The Canadian Teachers' Federation published a policy brief in 2024 calling for regulation of AI in K-12 education, describing the legislative landscape as fragmented with no accountability mechanisms specific to AI in schools.